Two recent pieces – one from McKnight’s Senior Living and another from JD Supra – grabbed attention with the same finding: 76% of older adults are not even considering senior living. Both were reporting on the University of Michigan’s National Poll on Healthy Aging, which asked adults aged 50 to 80 about their plans. The results were clear: most want to stay home, not move into an institution.
These aren’t two different studies. It’s the same data point echoed across sectors – senior living trade media and legal analysis alike. And the conclusion is hard to escape: assisted living is no longer the default model. It’s a system propped up by wealth, struggling labor forces, and Medicaid loopholes – and it’s looking more like a relic than a solution.
Let’s be blunt: assisted living markets itself as independence with a safety net. But what it really sells is a tiered system of haves and have-nots.
It’s not just expensive – it’s fundamentally inequitable. Medicaid rarely covers assisted living comprehensively, and when it does, it’s often at reimbursement rates so low that facilities cut corners. Many workers – who are overwhelmingly immigrants, women, and people of color – don’t even get adequate health coverage themselves. Imagine that: the very people providing intimate care for frail elders often can’t afford care for their own families.
Here’s the dirty secret that few in the assisted living industry want to say out loud: the system depends on immigrant labor.
Aides, personal care attendants, and low-wage frontline staff are the backbone of senior living, and those positions are rarely filled by native born Americans. Thus, instead of creating a system that cares for the senior citizens and the care personnel, we have created one that is heavily dependent on the immigrant workforce.
With less people to work in the senior care facilities, residents go without showers, medications get delayed, workers burn out and quit.
And who pays the price? Older adults, and the families scrambling to fill the gaps.
For low- and middle-income older adults, Medicaid is supposed to be the safety net. But the patchwork of state-by-state waivers and underfunded home- and community-based services (HCBS) leaves huge gaps. Waitlists stretch into years. Coverage doesn’t match real-world needs. Families are forced into impossible trade-offs: pay out-of-pocket until you’re broke, or risk unsafe living arrangements.
Meanwhile, assisted living operators blame Medicaid for “low rates” while quietly catering to private-pay residents who can afford $6,000–$8,000 a month. The rest? They’re left out in the cold.
Here’s what the poll revealed at its core: people don’t trust assisted living. They see it as too costly, too institutional, and too risky. They want to stay in their homes and communities. And honestly? They’re right.
Aging in place is not just sentiment – it’s a survival strategy. With planning and support, it can deliver:
So what now? If assisted living is a dying model, how do we make aging in place work?
Don’t wait for a fall or hospitalization. Modify homes now – grab bars, ramps, no-step showers, smart lighting, widened doorways.
Explore “Village” models or Naturally Occurring Retirement Communities (NORCs). These grassroots, often volunteer-driven groups pool resources to provide rides, errands, and social connection.
Smart devices, medication reminders, and remote monitoring are great. But nothing replaces human presence. Technology should enhance, not replace, care.
Demand expansion of Medicaid’s home- and community-based services. Insist on fair wages and benefits for direct care workers.
Aging in place is not a solo project. Caregivers need backup – siblings, neighbors, church groups, paid aides. Don’t wait until burnout sets in.
Here’s the in-your-face truth: assisted living is not failing because people don’t understand it. It’s failing because people do understand it. They see the price tags, the staff turnover, the understaffed night shifts, the glossy brochures that don’t match the reality.
Older adults and caregivers are voting with their feet. They want something better than a half-institutional compromise. They want dignity, affordability, safety, and community. Assisted living can cling to the old model if it wants, but the future belongs to aging in place.
And the sooner we stop pretending otherwise, the sooner we can build a system that actually works – for everyone.
Are you looking at senior living/assisted living options or have you decided to age in place? What are your caregiver options? Have you accommodated your home for aging in place?
Tags Getting Older Solo Living
This article is important, in that we all should give thought about how we are going to cope as we age.
All our circumstances are unique, so we need to give this some thought.
Ive worked in aged care & even twenty years ago I was relieved to get out of it and change to in home personal care. This started to wear me out still as there just wasn’t enough workers to keep up with the overwhelming aging population, especially the baby boomers era.
I left to return to my pharmacy assistant and retired 4 years ago. I know have some knowledge how the system works.
Its ok for the folks who are in the ‘have’s, but the ‘have nots’ definitely need a support network around them of some sorts.
I now think differently than I did even last year & making small changes where I can.
Aging at home in my opinion is definitely better, in their own safe environment.
Thanks Tessa.
As a person who works in healthcare and in a ST snd LT nursing facility understand that there is not enough help and people are overworked and under paid and the elderly who deserve the proper care are affected by it and yes people are aware and wish to stay home and can’t blame them
Thanks Maggie
You assume everyone has a network of family, friends and neighbors who will be available 24/7 to help out but that’s not a global solution. Assisted living needs government support so seniors can get their showers, meds etc. without looking around for outside people to help out.
I completely agree that not everyone has a strong support network — and in fact, families often fall short of the role they could and should play. But I still believe that aging in place, naturally occurring retirement communities, smart technology, and a mix of paid and volunteer support offer the best path to both independence and quality of life.
Here’s where I take issue: the assisted living industry continually pleads for funding, yet residents already pay anywhere from $3,000 to $12,000 a month. If facilities can’t deliver adequate care at those rates, that’s not a resource problem — it’s a management one. The truth is, most of these operators are in the real estate business, not the care business, and their priorities reflect that.
Please contact me. I have 3-1/2 years experience with assisted living facilities. I’m a 78 year old woman and a federal retiree. Shortly before retirement, I bought the best long term care insurance policy offered by the federal government. It cost me a junk of change but I thought I wanted to be as well prepared as possible for what lay ahead. I have mobility issues brought about by a severe scoliosis. At age 74, I was living alone, in my own home , as a widow. My children both lived out of state. I was having trouble recovering from all that covid brought so I decided to move into one of those well appointed assisted living facilities in Omaha. From Sep 2021 – May 2025, I lived in two such facilities. Both of them were far from what they advertised. In the second, I organized a Resident Council, under the guidance of the Ombudsman of the State Council on Elder Care and Aging. What happened to me over the next several months should be told to any family considering what to do with aging parents. To say that I experienced threats and retaliation would be an understatement. Please reach out because these issues need to be discussed nation wide.
Sharon – see my bio on Sixty and me. You can contact me through the links there.
Mr.Cirillo, i enjoyed the way you broke down the two options you discussed. I found many points that validated my choices and others that had me pause for thought to details things out.
Thank you for your article.
As usual, Margaret brings us great perks!
Let me know if I can be of assistance Beth