Why can’t families easily compare the quality, staffing and safety of the place where they may spend $6,000, $8,000 or $10,000 a month?
In a recent Sixty and Me article about ownership of senior living communities, one reader was shocked that few if any regulations exist in assisted living.
“Wow, I did not know most of this information. Are there independent reviews done in a standard format for Assisted Living? Where are they published? If not, is there a spreadsheet available with all the critical factors listed, that we can use to perform the review ourselves?”
My answer – no. Not really. And that may be one of the biggest failures in the entire assisted-living system.
We have standardized ratings for hotels, restaurants, cars, colleges, hospitals and nursing homes to name a few.
Yet when a family is about to make a $70,000–$120,000-a-year decision involving an older person’s safety and quality of life, there is no universally accepted consumer report card.
Why can I compare hotels by cleanliness, service and customer reviews, but I can’t easily compare assisted-living communities by staffing, turnover, training, medication errors or regulatory violations?
The basic problem: Assisted living is largely regulated by the states. So there isn’t one national standard for staffing, staff-to-resident ratios, training, inspections, reporting requirements, medication management, dementia care, complaints, disclosure of deficiencies.
When information exists, it may be buried in state databases, inspection reports or licensing records. Information isn’t the same thing as transparency. So don’t expect the community you’re evaluating to readily supply this information.
If you have to search three government websites and decipher a 40-page inspection report to figure out whether Mom’s prospective home has chronic staffing problems, that’s not meaningful transparency.
In a nutshell:
Here is a start in creating your own checklist.
Don’t just ask how many employees they have. Ask who is actually working at 2 a.m.
The advertised price isn’t necessarily the price.
Every resident should be entitled to certain minimum standards.
Whatever state you live in, shouldn’t there be a minimum level of training for someone responsible for administering medications?
Shouldn’t there be some minimum expectation for how many qualified people are available to care for residents overnight?
Shouldn’t families know how often employees are leaving?
Shouldn’t consumers be able to see a community’s history of serious complaints and violations in a standardized format?
After asking the important questions above, document your ratings by starting here. On a scale of 1-5, rate:
| Category | Score |
| Staffing | /5 |
| Staff turnover | /5 |
| Training | /5 |
| Safety | /5 |
| Dementia care | /5 |
| Resident experience | /5 |
| Leadership stability | /5 |
| Transparency | /5 |
| Cost transparency | /5 |
| Regulatory history | /5 |
You get the idea.
We have decided that families deserve standardized information when buying a refrigerator, a car or a hotel room. Yet when they’re choosing where their mother, father or spouse will live – and where they may spend the final years of their life – we essentially tell them to take a tour and trust their gut.
That’s not a system of transparency. It’s a system of hope.
Maybe it’s time for an assisted-living report card.
If a standardized Assisted Living Consumer Scorecard existed, would you use it? What would you add?