When we landed in Vietnam, the first thing my travelling companion did was change the SIM card in his phone. He did it at the airport, so that he could stay fully connected to home.
I used my phone differently on that trip. It was mostly a camera. Every so often I called my daughter to check in. The rest of the time, home was not in my hand.
We were on the same trip, in the same country, but we were not experiencing the same distance.
Throughout the trip, my travelling companion carried on an argument with his sister. He called and texted his mother often. At one point his sister told him their mother needed a break. The calls and messages continued anyway.
I don’t tell this to criticise him. What he did was normal and understandable. Most of us would do the same, and many of us have.
But I watched the tension from home travel with him. The plane changed our location. It did not automatically change what had access to us.
It rarely does. Family conflict comes along. So do work emails, group chats, other people’s expectations and the emotional obligations we hold. None of it has to be dramatic. A message that needs an answer, a decision only you can make, a quick call that turns into a long one. We go on performing our usual roles, just from another country.
A pattern showed itself. After a difficult call or message, he was physically in Vietnam but mentally back inside the family situation. It took time for him to return to where he was. Then another conversation would pull him away again.
My own days were different. I took photographs. I noticed what was around me. I let Vietnam hold my attention, and I checked in with my daughter without staying permanently connected.
Where you are is decided less by where your body is than by what has your attention. Two people can stand in front of the same view and only one of them is looking at it.
This isn’t an article about phones being bad. Mine was my camera and my line to my daughter. The phone is only the mechanism.
The real issue is roles. A woman can travel a very long way and remain the mother, the fixer, the organiser, the emotional support person. She can still be the decision-maker, the one everyone calls, the one who smooths things over, the one who is always available.
None of these roles is a fault. Most were taken on out of love and kept up out of habit. But a role that is never set down goes everywhere you go.
You can book a beautiful hotel and remain on duty the whole time you are there.
By 60, many of us have accumulated decades of responsibility. There are adult children, partners, ageing parents, grandchildren, long friendships, a working history, years of caregiving. There are family dynamics that were set long ago.
These are not burdens to resent. They are a life. But they do mean that, wherever you are, a great many people are used to having access to you.
Travel can offer something rare: time in which nobody immediately needs you to be the version of yourself they know.
That only happens if you deliberately create some separation. Otherwise the familiar version of you travels too, answering as she always has.
Before your next trip, it’s worth asking yourself a few questions.
The answers turn into simple arrangements. Agree on check-in times before you go, so nobody is left wondering. Mute the conversations that aren’t essential. Keep parts of each day phone-free.
Ask whether non-urgent family conflict really needs to come with you, or whether it can wait until you are home. Use the phone for maps, photographs and practical needs without remaining emotionally on call.
This is not about disappearing. It is about creating enough interruption for something different to happen.
Notice what happens when you stop being instantly available. The first hours can be the hardest, because the reach for the phone is automatic.
You might feel relief, or guilt. Anxiety, or freedom. Boredom, uncertainty, curiosity. Possibly several of these in one afternoon.
Whatever you feel is useful information. If being unavailable for a few hours feels impossible, that may tell you something important about how much of your ordinary life is built around availability. It does not mean you have done anything wrong. It means you have found the edge of a habit, and edges are worth knowing about.
My travelling companion and I had both flown thousands of miles. Distance turned out not to be something the plane gave us. It was something we each chose, moment by moment, to take.
A destination can give you distance from home. It cannot make you use it.
When you travel, do you actually leave your ordinary life behind for a while, or do you carry it with you in your pocket?